Saturday, June 22, 2013

Twin Houses

Darby Township, Union County, Ohio

This farmhouse doesn't seem particularly noteworthy at first glance. I encountered the property owner (?), who seemed neither hostile nor thrilled about my trespass. Not wanting to overstay my welcome, I captured only a few photographs.


While the one-and-a-half-story front ell is quite featureless, the rear section is constructed of brick, with segmental arched windows at the basement level. I first assumed that the brick portion was built prior to the frame section; an incorrect assumption, as it turns out.

West facade. The tarp covers an arched basement-level window.
Porch area. Note the row of vertical bricks, barely visible between the porch floor and door.

 A few months ago, I discovered an identical house merely a half-mile away.

The twin house, thankfully inhabited.  Photo (circa 2001?) is from the Union County Auditor's website.
Both buildings feature the same odd brick section and, obviously, were designed by the same individual. The 1877 county atlas lists A.M. Vollrath as the owner of both parcels, though neither house existed at that time. Vollrath immigrated to Union County from Germany at an unknown date, and likely constructed both homes in the late 19th century.

The northern section of Darby Township contains a number of brick farmhouses, part of a German settlement area centered around nearby St. John's Lutheran Church.

Friday, June 14, 2013

Gangloff House

Cranberry Township, Crawford County, Ohio

This house isn't notable for its age, but for its lack of age. Upon seeing a cruddy aerial photograph, I assumed it was a mid-19th century structure, possibly log, and probably one of the earliest homes in the township. I was surprised when I actually visited the site.

The yellow brick chimneys and balloon frame construction are indicative of late 19th century construction, though the home's overall appearance seems earlier. I can't quite explain why — the answer lies in its proportions, perhaps — but it just feels old.

The rather featureless front facade. It's difficult to discern, but the porch posts' upper portions curve in an interesting manner. I like the birds perched atop the chimney; they add eeriness to an otherwise boring picture.
The balloon frame construction is plainly visible. Note the original wood shingle roof, mostly covered by standing seam metal.
Not surprisingly, the 1850s and 1873 atlases show nothing at this location. P.J. Gangloff owned the 60-acre farm in the 1850s. By 1873, ownership had passed to Henry Gangloff. The house remained inhabited until at least 1970, as a county directory from that year lists John Kreim as its inhabitant.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

McConnell Log House

Chillicothe, Ross County, Ohio

Constructed in 1828, this house is one of about a handful of known double pen ("dogtrot") log buildings in Ohio. The Chillicothe Country Club has used it as a clubhouse since 1915; prior to this, it was owned by Joseph McConnell and known as "Grand View Farm." A 1955 fire severely damaged the building, though the exact extent of the damage is unknown to me.

Compare this photo (2012) with the 1875 illustration below.
It seems that the roof was raised between 1875 and 2012.  Donald Hutslar, writer of The Architecture of Migration, mentioned that the uppermost wall logs terminate in the second floor rooms. This would make sense if the house began as a one-and-a-half-story building and received its full-height upper story later, as suggested by the illustration.
Former hallway ("breezeway"), looking east. The downward wall extensions mark the edges of the two log pens. Nothing remains of this room's original finish, but I suspect it contained the stairway.
Former front (east) elevation. The steeple-notched logs are separated by large gaps, and were probably originally covered by siding. Unlike the quintessential southern dogtrot, double pen log buildings in Ohio almost always had enclosed breezeways.
Joists mortises on the facade. The doorway originally functioned as a window.


Six-over-nine window, located in the north pen. Like the mantel, this trim was probably salvaged from another building.
Foundation stones.
A floor joist, seen in the basement. The subfloor is either whitewashed or painted.
This doorway is cut into what was once the rear wall. The staircase is a later addition. Log buildings typically have thick walls; this one is no exception.
This drywall (or plaster?) probably encases a log.
The building's current floor plan . . .
. . . and how I believe the house appeared when built.
I'd like to thank Beth Hartsock for allowing me access to the property, and Donald Hutslar for informing me about the house's existence.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Spitler Log House - Part 2

Despite fifty-plus years of abandonment, the house's interior remains quite intact. Much of the finish detail likely dates to the 1840s or 1850s, or about when the braced frame addition was constructed.

The log portion's interior. For some reason, all trim is missing from the back wall, but remains elsewhere.
Enclosed stairs with closet underneath; log portion. Earlier structures had less sophisticated, more steeply rising staircases. The last step lies outside of the stairwell itself, a typical arrangement.
Wainscoted interior wall. This wall may have been moved, for it contains horizontal lath, rather than the diagonal lath seen elsewhere. The home's current room configuration is rather strange (see the floor plan at the end of this post).
Seen in the kitchen (?) addition, this was once the house's rear wall. The left door leads into a small, narrow room, while the other door exits into the primary living space. Intact daubing is visible below the wall itself.
Braced frame addition, interior. This addition is free-standing, connected to the log portion only by a shared roof structure. The lack of connection between the house's second floor rooms necessitated a second staircase. The joists are gigantic; larger than the logs (!) that compose the original house.
Mortise and tenon, rear addition. This joint was secured without nails.
I have no idea why these joists are so darn large.
The log portion's joists, however, are more what I'd expect to see.
The word "chinking" refers to the objects (wood slabs, in this case) placed between the logs of a log building. The mortar that fills the gaps in the chinking is known as "daubing." In recent years, the two words have become synonymous.
Though the house's trim is secured with square nails, this siding uses round nails. Dating buildings by nail type is difficult, but, at least, the varying nails seen here indicate that the trim and siding are not contemporaneous.
So-called steeple notching is seldom seen on a post-1820s building unless it was sided immediately following construction, as was probably the case here.
Screen door hinge, probably from the late 19th century. The bark-covered log might be a good candidate for dendrochronological dating.
The ends of these pole rafters are attached to a board running parallel with the roof ridge, inspired by balloon frame construction. According to Donald Hutslar, framing such as this is not seen on buildings constructed before the 1830s or 1840s.
Lastly, a floor plan, not entirely to scale. I suspect that the log section was once divided into two rooms of roughly equal size, and featured two front entries.